In an article, published in an article, once mentioned the application of 92361-49-4, Name is Chloro(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)bis(triphenylphosphine)ruthenium(II),molecular formula is C46H45ClP2Ru, is a conventional compound. this article was the specific content is as follows.Application In Synthesis of Chloro(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)bis(triphenylphosphine)ruthenium(II)
Trichlorostannyl complexes [Ru(SnCl3) (Cp?)L] (2a-c) were prepared by treatment of optically active half-sandwich chlorocomplexes [RuCl(Cp?)L] (1a-c) with an excess of SnCl2.2H2O in ethanol. Treatment of trichlorostannyl complexes 2a-c with NaBH4 afforded trihydridostannyl derivatives [Ru(SnH3) (Cp?)L] (3a-c) in moderated yields. Treatment of 2a-c with MgBrMe gave the trimethylstannyl complexes Ru(SnMe3) (Cp?)L (4a-c). Alkynylstannyl derivatives [Ru{Sn(C?CPh)3}(Cp?)L] (5a-c) were prepared by treatment of trichlorostannyl compounds 2a-c with an excess of LiC?CPh in thf. All the complexes present optical activity. The complexes were characterized spectroscopically and by X-ray crystal structure determination of [RuCl(eta5-C5Me5)L] (1b), [Ru(SnCl3) (eta5-C5Me5)L] (2b), and [Ru(SnCl3) (eta5-C9H7)L] (2c). The influence of different ligands on the Ru?P interaction in several complexes 1a-c, 2a-c and 3a-c was evaluated by DFT calculations. These calculations indicate that [SnCl3]- has a stronger stabilization effect than [Cl]- and the same occurs between ?C9H7 and ?C5Me5. These relative stabilities combined with the distortion energies of the fragments produce a stabilizing effect in the Ru?P bonds of complex 2c that is twice as strong as in the 1b complex.
Do you like my blog? If you like, you can also browse other articles about this kind. Application In Synthesis of Chloro(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)bis(triphenylphosphine)ruthenium(II). Thanks for taking the time to read the blog about 92361-49-4
Reference：
Highly efficient and robust molecular ruthenium catalysts for water oxidation,
Catalysts | Special Issue : Ruthenium Catalysts – MDPI